JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 12, 2011

A- de 2011

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa

✓Claimant Pedro Nel Rueda Garces·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Reiteración de improcedencia
  • Procedencia dentro del término de ejecutoria, de oficio o a solicitud de parte respecto de conceptos o frases contenidas en la parte resolutiva o que influyan en ella
Accion De Tutela De Empresa De Telecomunicaciones En Materia De Laudo Arbitral
  • Denegar por cuanto peticionario no señala incongruencia con parte motiva de sentencia T-058/09
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de Aclaración sentencia.

El memorialista pretende que se precisen los alcances de la parte resolutiva de la sentencia de la referencia, en cuanto a la competencia de la Comisión de Regulación de Telecomunicaciones.

La Sala deniega la solicitud de aclaración impetrada, por cuanto no se evidencia que el aparte señalado influya en el entendimiento pleno de la sentencia o impida el cumplimiento de lo decidido en la misma.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DENEGAR la solicitud de aclaración formulada por Pedro Nel Rueda Garcés, Asesor Oficina Jurídica del Ministerio de Comunicaciones.
  2. Segundo. INFORMAR al señor Pedro Nel Rueda Garcés, que contra el presente auto no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.